EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2019-12-17

EC/Switzerland/Liechtenstein Agreement on establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum: access to Eurodac. Protocol

Migration & Asylum66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "asylum"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Migration & Asylum
Vote ID 110684Source: official EP roll-call records
30
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Procedural or paragraph vote
  • High-interest topic: Migration
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+3 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+0 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “EC/Switzerland/Liechtenstein Agreement on establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum: access to Eurodac. Protocol”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (596 for, 35 against, 4 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.

Result analysis

For
596
Against
35
Abstain
4
Margin of victory
561 votes
Turnout (cast)
635
Absent
43
Participation rate
93.7%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP173 MEPs
For 163Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
S&D132 MEPs
For 125Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
Renew96 MEPs
For 93Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Greens/EFA67 MEPs
For 66Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
PfE64 MEPs
For 60Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
ECR59 MEPs
For 55Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
NI43 MEPs
For 27Against 5Abstain 1Absent 10
The Left37 MEPs
For 1Against 29Abstain 2Absent 5
ESN4 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany86
  • Italy65
  • France63
  • Poland46
  • Spain43
Most against

None.

Divided delegations
  • Greece
  • Ireland
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria18 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium21 MEPs
For 20Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Croatia11 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Denmark13 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland13 MEPs
For 11Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
France74 MEPs
For 63Against 4Abstain 1Absent 6
Germany96 MEPs
For 86Against 7Abstain 0Absent 3
Greece21 MEPs
For 11Against 6Abstain 3Absent 1
Hungary21 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Ireland11 MEPs
For 7Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy73 MEPs
For 65Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
Latvia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands26 MEPs
For 24Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Poland51 MEPs
For 46Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Romania32 MEPs
For 30Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovakia13 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain54 MEPs
For 43Against 4Abstain 0Absent 7
Sweden20 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share