EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2020-04-16

Demande d'application de la procédure d'urgence: Projet de budget rectificatif n° 2/2020: fourniture d'une aide d'urgence aux États membres et nouveau renforcement du mécanisme de protection civile de l’Union/rescEU afin de faire face à la pandémie de COVID-19 - C9-0109/2020 (2020/2055(BUD))

Budget66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "budget"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Budget
Vote ID 113091Source: official EP roll-call records
44
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Resolution / budget vote
  • Budget-related
  • High-interest topic: Budget
  • High participation
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+15 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+12 / 15
Rebel votes+0 / 10
Group division+0 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Demande d'application de la procédure d'urgence: Projet de budget rectificatif n° 2/2020: fourniture d'une aide d'urgence aux États membres et nouveau renforcement du mécanisme de protection civile de l’Union/rescEU afin de faire face à la pandémie de COVID-19 - C9-0109/2020 (2020/2055(BUD))”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (679 for, 5 against, 1 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
679
Against
5
Abstain
1
Margin of victory
674 votes
Turnout (cast)
685
Absent
19
Participation rate
97.3%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 175Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
S&D136 MEPs
For 133Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Renew101 MEPs
For 100Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Greens/EFA71 MEPs
For 67Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
PfE66 MEPs
For 65Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
ECR63 MEPs
For 61Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
NI44 MEPs
For 37Against 3Abstain 1Absent 3
The Left38 MEPs
For 36Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
ESN4 MEPs
For 3Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany91
  • France78
  • Italy75
  • Spain57
  • Poland50
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 1Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Denmark14 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
France79 MEPs
For 78Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Germany96 MEPs
For 91Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Greece21 MEPs
For 20Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Hungary21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Ireland13 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 75Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Latvia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 28Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland52 MEPs
For 50Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Portugal21 MEPs
For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Romania33 MEPs
For 30Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain58 MEPs
For 57Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Sweden21 MEPs
For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share