Specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (38 for, 613 against, 40 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
None.
- Germany88
- France56
- Spain52
- Poland50
- Italy46
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…