COVID-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification, and the consequences for Schengen and the single market
Migration & Asylum66%★
- title/description contains "schengen"
Health65%
- title/description contains "health"
Internal Market64%
- title/description contains "single market"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Migration
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “COVID-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification, and the consequences for Schengen and the single market”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (595 for, 50 against, 41 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany78
- Spain58
- France56
- Poland51
- Italy44
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…