The draft Commission regulation amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 as regards specifications for titanium dioxide (E 171)
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The draft Commission regulation amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 as regards specifications for titanium dioxide (E 171)”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while ECR and ESN voted mostly against. EPP mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (443 for, 118 against, 135 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France76
- Italy58
- Germany47
- Spain40
- Portugal15
- Poland26
- Czech Republic10
- Czech Republic
- Estonia
- Lithuania
- Poland
- Romania
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…