Improving development effectiveness and efficiency of aid
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Improving development effectiveness and efficiency of aid”. EPP, Renew, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (331 for, 294 against, 72 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France50
- Italy37
- Romania22
- Hungary16
- Czech Republic12
- Germany45
- Spain37
- Netherlands16
- Portugal13
- Austria12
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…