EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2020-12-16

Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management

Budget66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "budget"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Budget
Institutional Affairs61%
Confidence: 61%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "interinstitutional"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Institutional Affairs
Vote ID 125904Source: official EP roll-call records
64
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Resolution / budget vote
  • Budget-related
  • High-interest topic: Budget
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+15 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+12 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (550 for, 72 against, 73 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
550
Against
72
Abstain
73
Margin of victory
478 votes
Turnout (cast)
695
Absent
9
Participation rate
98.7%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP180 MEPs
For 164Against 0Abstain 14Absent 2
S&D136 MEPs
For 135Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Renew100 MEPs
For 98Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Greens/EFA71 MEPs
For 69Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
PfE66 MEPs
For 7Against 35Abstain 24Absent 0
ECR63 MEPs
For 27Against 17Abstain 18Absent 1
NI44 MEPs
For 28Against 11Abstain 3Absent 2
The Left38 MEPs
For 20Against 5Abstain 13Absent 0
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany80
  • Spain55
  • France50
  • Poland48
  • Italy39
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 16Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium21 MEPs
For 15Against 3Abstain 3Absent 0
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Croatia12 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 3Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 14Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Denmark14 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 1Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
France79 MEPs
For 50Against 23Abstain 6Absent 0
Germany96 MEPs
For 80Against 11Abstain 2Absent 3
Greece21 MEPs
For 17Against 3Abstain 1Absent 0
Hungary21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Ireland13 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 39Against 0Abstain 35Absent 2
Latvia8 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 22Against 5Abstain 2Absent 0
Poland52 MEPs
For 48Against 2Abstain 1Absent 1
Portugal21 MEPs
For 19Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Romania33 MEPs
For 32Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 10Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain59 MEPs
For 55Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Sweden20 MEPs
For 10Against 3Abstain 7Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share