Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
AI & Technology67%★
- title/description contains "artificial intelligence"
Defence & Security66%
- title/description contains "military"
Justice64%
- title/description contains "criminal justice"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Defence
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice”. EPP, Renew, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (360 for, 314 against, 19 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France53
- Poland43
- Romania23
- Netherlands17
- Hungary16
- Germany57
- Italy50
- Spain37
- Portugal12
- Belgium10
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…