Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
AI & Technology67%★
- title/description contains "artificial intelligence"
Defence & Security66%
- title/description contains "military"
Justice64%
- title/description contains "criminal justice"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Defence
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice”. EPP, Renew, PfE, ECR and NI voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (364 for, 274 against, 52 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy56
- Poland43
- Romania21
- Hungary16
- Netherlands14
- France49
- Germany44
- Spain28
- Portugal12
- Sweden8
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…