EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2021-03-09

A WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism

Climate & Environment66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "carbon"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Climate & Environment
Trade65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "wto"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Trade
Vote ID 128552Source: official EP roll-call records
59
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Climate
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+12 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+10 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “A WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism”. S&D, Greens-EFA, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew, PfE and ECR voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a narrow margin (339 for, 320 against, 38 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
339
Against
320
Abstain
38
Margin of victory
19 votes
Turnout (cast)
697
Absent
8
Participation rate
98.9%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 19 votes. 8 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (8) was not larger than the 19-vote margin.

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 22Against 147Abstain 6Absent 4
S&D136 MEPs
For 114Against 20Abstain 1Absent 1
Renew101 MEPs
For 23Against 50Abstain 26Absent 2
Greens/EFA71 MEPs
For 70Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
PfE67 MEPs
For 26Against 41Abstain 0Absent 0
ECR63 MEPs
For 23Against 40Abstain 0Absent 0
NI44 MEPs
For 21Against 18Abstain 5Absent 0
The Left38 MEPs
For 38Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
ESN4 MEPs
For 2Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Italy59
  • Germany48
  • Spain38
  • Netherlands18
  • Belgium12
Most against
  • Poland39
  • France30
  • Romania23
  • Hungary16
  • Sweden16
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 8Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium21 MEPs
For 12Against 7Abstain 2Absent 0
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 7Against 10Abstain 0Absent 0
Croatia12 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 2Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 10Against 9Abstain 1Absent 1
Denmark14 MEPs
For 7Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 5Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
France79 MEPs
For 27Against 30Abstain 21Absent 1
Germany96 MEPs
For 48Against 47Abstain 0Absent 1
Greece21 MEPs
For 10Against 9Abstain 2Absent 0
Hungary21 MEPs
For 5Against 16Abstain 0Absent 0
Ireland13 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 59Against 15Abstain 0Absent 2
Latvia8 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 18Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland52 MEPs
For 13Against 39Abstain 0Absent 0
Portugal21 MEPs
For 12Against 8Abstain 1Absent 0
Romania33 MEPs
For 8Against 23Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 3Absent 0
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 2Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain59 MEPs
For 38Against 15Abstain 6Absent 0
Sweden21 MEPs
For 4Against 16Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share