General framework for securitisation and specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “General framework for securitisation and specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis”. PfE, Greens-EFA, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (183 for, 472 against, 35 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France47
- Finland8
- Ireland7
- Italy60
- Poland50
- Germany49
- Spain42
- Romania31
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…