The views of Parliament on the ongoing assessment by the Commission and the Council of the national recovery and resilience plans
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The views of Parliament on the ongoing assessment by the Commission and the Council of the national recovery and resilience plans”. PfE and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (107 for, 532 against, 53 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy42
- Germany86
- Poland50
- Spain50
- Romania32
- Netherlands29
- Greece
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…