European Investigation Order in criminal matters: alignment with EU rules on the protection of personal data
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “European Investigation Order in criminal matters: alignment with EU rules on the protection of personal data”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (659 for, 7 against, 22 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany82
- France79
- Italy73
- Spain58
- Poland51
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…