Artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters
AI & Technology67%★
- title/description contains "artificial intelligence"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Ai Technology
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (377 for, 248 against, 62 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany52
- France48
- Spain42
- Netherlands21
- Romania19
- Italy35
- Hungary13
- Greece10
- Austria
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…