Bloc 16 - Am 896, 949, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 134, 950, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 913, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 21, 943, 18, 944, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 170, 942, 937, 938, 939, 174, 940, 941
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Amendment vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Bloc 16 - Am 896, 949, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 134, 950, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 913, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 21, 943, 18, 944, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 170, 942, 937, 938, 939, 174, 940, 941”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (584 for, 53 against, 58 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany83
- France56
- Spain55
- Italy51
- Poland51
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…