Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance
Corruption65%★
- title/description contains "money laundering"
Taxation65%
- title/description contains "tax evasion"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Corruption
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (432 for, 208 against, 56 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany54
- France48
- Spain45
- Italy38
- Poland35
- Hungary13
- Austria10
- Austria
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…