Legal migration policy and law
Migration & Asylum66%★
- title/description contains "migration"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Migration
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Legal migration policy and law”. S&D, Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (266 for, 363 against, 57 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Spain31
- Portugal18
- Ireland6
- Cyprus4
- Malta4
- Germany48
- Italy47
- Poland40
- France34
- Romania22
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…