Avoiding corruption, irregular spending and misuse of EU and national funds in case of emergency funds and crisis related spending areas
Corruption65%★
- title/description contains "corruption"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Corruption
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Avoiding corruption, irregular spending and misuse of EU and national funds in case of emergency funds and crisis related spending areas”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly in favour. PfE, ECR and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (553 for, 29 against, 115 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany81
- France56
- Spain54
- Italy42
- Romania32
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…