← Votes·2022-05-05

Packaging and labelling of veterinary medicinal products: transitional rules

Vote ID 143008Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Main vote
✓Legislative procedure
✓High participation

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+0 / 15

Turnout+4 / 5

Vote type+25 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+15 / 15

Rebel votes+0 / 10

Group division+0 / 15

Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Packaging and labelling of veterinary medicinal products: transitional rules”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (589 for, 5 against, 2 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For

589

Against

Abstain

Margin of victory

584 votes

Turnout (cast)

596

Absent

109

Participation rate

84.5%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs

For 149Against 0Abstain 0Absent 30

S&D136 MEPs

For 111Against 1Abstain 0Absent 24

Renew101 MEPs

For 92Against 0Abstain 0Absent 9

Greens/EFA71 MEPs

For 61Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10

PfE67 MEPs

For 54Against 1Abstain 0Absent 12

ECR63 MEPs

For 51Against 1Abstain 0Absent 11

NI44 MEPs

For 32Against 2Abstain 2Absent 8

The Left38 MEPs

For 33Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5

ESN4 MEPs

For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour

Germany80
France64
Italy64
Spain56
Poland45

Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria19 MEPs

For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Belgium21 MEPs

For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6

Croatia12 MEPs

For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Denmark14 MEPs

For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Estonia7 MEPs

For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Finland14 MEPs

For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

France79 MEPs

For 64Against 1Abstain 0Absent 14

Germany96 MEPs

For 80Against 1Abstain 0Absent 15

Greece21 MEPs

For 13Against 0Abstain 2Absent 6

Hungary21 MEPs

For 15Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6

Ireland13 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Italy76 MEPs

For 64Against 1Abstain 0Absent 11

Latvia8 MEPs

For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 9Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Malta6 MEPs

For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Netherlands29 MEPs

For 24Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5

Poland52 MEPs

For 45Against 1Abstain 0Absent 6

Portugal21 MEPs

For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Romania33 MEPs

For 22Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11

Slovakia14 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Slovenia8 MEPs

For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Spain59 MEPs

For 56Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Sweden21 MEPs

For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Importance Score

What was this vote about?

Why it matters

Result analysis

By political group

Country angle

Individual MEP positions

Download & share