Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Amending the Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act and the Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act
Climate & Environment66%★
- title/description contains "climate"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Climate
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Amending the Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act and the Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act”. S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew, ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (278 for, 328 against, 33 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany58
- Spain34
- Portugal18
- Austria16
- Belgium12
- France44
- Italy40
- Poland40
- Romania29
- Czech Republic17
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Finland
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Latvia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…