The rule of law in Malta, five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The rule of law in Malta, five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (564 for, 10 against, 17 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany76
- France69
- Italy60
- Spain50
- Poland44
- Malta4
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…