Tuesday’s Agenda - Request from the ECR and EPP groups
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Tuesday’s Agenda - Request from the ECR and EPP groups”. EPP, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (171 for, 206 against, 8 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy20
- Poland19
- Netherlands13
- Belgium9
- Hungary8
- France32
- Germany31
- Spain20
- Sweden11
- Portugal10
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Germany
- Italy
- Latvia
- Netherlands
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…