Centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third-country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN)
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third-country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN)”. EPP, S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while ECR, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (431 for, 121 against, 25 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany69
- Italy53
- France47
- Spain46
- Netherlands21
- Poland25
- Hungary10
- Belgium
- Greece
- Hungary
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…