Implementation of “passerelle” clauses in the EU Treaties
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Implementation of “passerelle” clauses in the EU Treaties”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, ECR, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (477 for, 102 against, 54 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany67
- Italy64
- France54
- Spain47
- Poland36
- Hungary11
- Denmark7
- Cyprus3
- Cyprus
- Denmark
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…