Recommendations for reform of European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption
Corruption86%★
- title/description contains "corruption"
- title/description contains "anti-corruption"
Institutional Affairs61%
- title/description contains "european parliament"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Corruption
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Recommendations for reform of European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP and PfE voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (389 for, 170 against, 31 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany52
- France44
- Poland39
- Spain35
- Italy33
- Hungary10
- Greece4
- Czech Republic
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
- Latvia
- Portugal
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…