Recommendations for reform of European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption
Corruption86%★
- title/description contains "corruption"
- title/description contains "anti-corruption"
Institutional Affairs61%
- title/description contains "european parliament"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Corruption
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Recommendations for reform of European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP and ECR voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (326 for, 187 against, 57 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany75
- France57
- Spain26
- Sweden19
- Netherlands14
- Italy40
- Poland35
- Romania14
- Croatia7
- Greece6
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Estonia
- Latvia
- Romania
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…