← Votes·2023-09-14

Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials

Internal Market85%★

Confidence: 85%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

dossier "critical raw materials" implies this topic

Reviewed: yes

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Internal Market →

Environment60%

Confidence: 60%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

dossier "critical raw materials" implies this topic

Reviewed: no

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Environment →

Vote ID 158114Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Main vote
✓Legislative procedure
✓Some political group division
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+8 / 15

Turnout+4 / 5

Vote type+25 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+15 / 15

Rebel votes+7 / 10

Group division+6 / 15

Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE and NI voted mostly in favour, while Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (515 for, 34 against, 28 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For

515

Against

Abstain

Margin of victory

481 votes

Turnout (cast)

577

Absent

128

Participation rate

81.8%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs

For 143Against 3Abstain 1Absent 32

S&D136 MEPs

For 106Against 0Abstain 0Absent 30

Renew100 MEPs

For 86Against 0Abstain 0Absent 14

Greens/EFA71 MEPs

For 55Against 2Abstain 7Absent 7

ECR65 MEPs

For 51Against 1Abstain 4Absent 9

PfE64 MEPs

For 44Against 6Abstain 0Absent 14

The Left37 MEPs

For 5Against 15Abstain 12Absent 5

NI46 MEPs

For 22Against 5Abstain 3Absent 16

ESN4 MEPs

For 0Against 2Abstain 1Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour

Germany72
Italy60
France50
Spain46
Poland45

Most against

None.

Divided delegations

Cyprus

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria19 MEPs

For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Belgium21 MEPs

For 17Against 1Abstain 0Absent 3

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10

Croatia12 MEPs

For 10Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 2Against 2Abstain 0Absent 2

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 17Against 0Abstain 1Absent 3

Denmark14 MEPs

For 11Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2

Estonia7 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Finland14 MEPs

For 8Against 4Abstain 1Absent 1

France79 MEPs

For 50Against 0Abstain 12Absent 17

Germany96 MEPs

For 72Against 9Abstain 2Absent 13

Greece21 MEPs

For 11Against 2Abstain 0Absent 8

Hungary21 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10

Ireland13 MEPs

For 7Against 3Abstain 1Absent 2

Italy76 MEPs

For 60Against 0Abstain 1Absent 15

Latvia8 MEPs

For 7Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Malta6 MEPs

For 3Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Netherlands29 MEPs

For 23Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3

Poland52 MEPs

For 45Against 0Abstain 1Absent 6

Portugal21 MEPs

For 17Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0

Romania33 MEPs

For 26Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7

Slovakia14 MEPs

For 6Against 0Abstain 1Absent 7

Slovenia8 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Spain59 MEPs

For 46Against 5Abstain 1Absent 7

Sweden21 MEPs

For 15Against 1Abstain 3Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…