EP Rules of Procedure: strengthening integrity, independence and accountability
Institutional Affairs61%★
- title/description contains "rules of procedure"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “EP Rules of Procedure: strengthening integrity, independence and accountability”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while ECR voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (552 for, 59 against, 36 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France73
- Italy67
- Germany59
- Spain54
- Romania30
- Poland25
- Hungary
- Poland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…