EP Rules of Procedure: strengthening integrity, independence and accountability
Institutional Affairs61%★
- title/description contains "rules of procedure"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “EP Rules of Procedure: strengthening integrity, independence and accountability”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (586 for, 29 against, 34 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France71
- Italy68
- Spain58
- Germany54
- Poland49
None.
- Hungary
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…