The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Media Freedom65%
- title/description contains "journalist"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (477 for, 22 against, 13 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany69
- France66
- Spain43
- Poland39
- Italy30
None.
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…