EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2023-10-19

The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists

Rule of Law65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "rule of law"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Rule of Law
Media Freedom65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "journalist"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Media Freedom
Vote ID 159678Source: official EP roll-call records
37
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Procedural or paragraph vote
  • High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
  • Some political group division
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+15 / 15
Turnout+2 / 5
Vote type+3 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (445 for, 13 against, 47 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.

Result analysis

For
445
Against
13
Abstain
47
Margin of victory
432 votes
Turnout (cast)
505
Absent
197
Participation rate
71.9%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP177 MEPs
For 126Against 0Abstain 1Absent 50
S&D136 MEPs
For 92Against 0Abstain 0Absent 44
Renew100 MEPs
For 78Against 0Abstain 0Absent 22
Greens/EFA71 MEPs
For 57Against 0Abstain 0Absent 14
PfE64 MEPs
For 6Against 6Abstain 33Absent 19
ECR64 MEPs
For 41Against 0Abstain 4Absent 19
NI46 MEPs
For 20Against 5Abstain 5Absent 16
The Left37 MEPs
For 23Against 0Abstain 2Absent 12
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany61
  • France47
  • Spain46
  • Poland37
  • Italy34
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 3Absent 6
Belgium21 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 1Abstain 1Absent 4
Denmark14 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Estonia7 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Finland14 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
France79 MEPs
For 47Against 1Abstain 14Absent 17
Germany96 MEPs
For 61Against 7Abstain 1Absent 27
Greece21 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 2Absent 12
Hungary21 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 15
Ireland13 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 34Against 0Abstain 18Absent 24
Latvia8 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta6 MEPs
For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 19Against 1Abstain 1Absent 8
Poland49 MEPs
For 37Against 0Abstain 0Absent 12
Portugal21 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 2Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 24Against 0Abstain 0Absent 9
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 2Absent 2
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain59 MEPs
For 46Against 0Abstain 0Absent 13
Sweden21 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 2Absent 7

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share