The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Media Freedom65%
- title/description contains "journalist"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The rule of law in Malta: six years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, and the need to protect journalists”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (445 for, 13 against, 47 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany61
- France47
- Spain46
- Poland37
- Italy34
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…