EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2023-11-09

Conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)

Fisheries66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "fisheries"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Fisheries
Taxation65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "vat"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Taxation
Vote ID 159742Source: official EP roll-call records
67
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+6 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (533 for, 51 against, 11 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
533
Against
51
Abstain
11
Margin of victory
482 votes
Turnout (cast)
595
Absent
107
Participation rate
84.8%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP177 MEPs
For 150Against 2Abstain 0Absent 25
S&D136 MEPs
For 110Against 0Abstain 0Absent 26
Renew100 MEPs
For 82Against 1Abstain 0Absent 17
Greens/EFA71 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
ECR64 MEPs
For 53Against 6Abstain 1Absent 4
PfE64 MEPs
For 11Against 37Abstain 4Absent 12
NI46 MEPs
For 28Against 4Abstain 3Absent 11
The Left37 MEPs
For 33Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
ESN4 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 3Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany72
  • Spain55
  • France49
  • Italy46
  • Poland44
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 14Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Belgium21 MEPs
For 18Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 13Against 1Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 2Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Denmark14 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
France79 MEPs
For 49Against 16Abstain 0Absent 14
Germany96 MEPs
For 72Against 0Abstain 6Absent 18
Greece21 MEPs
For 15Against 2Abstain 0Absent 4
Hungary21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Ireland13 MEPs
For 11Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 46Against 18Abstain 1Absent 11
Latvia8 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 23Against 2Abstain 0Absent 4
Poland49 MEPs
For 44Against 1Abstain 1Absent 3
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Romania33 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 13
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain59 MEPs
For 55Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Sweden21 MEPs
For 15Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share