Thursday’s Agenda - Request from the Renew Group
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Thursday’s Agenda - Request from the Renew Group”. Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, PfE, ECR, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (145 for, 252 against, 26 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France29
- Netherlands13
- Denmark6
- Finland3
- Luxembourg2
- Italy32
- Spain29
- Germany25
- Poland15
- Hungary13
- Austria
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- France
- Germany
- Luxembourg
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…