EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2023-11-23

The revised Pollinators Initiative – A new deal for pollinators

Defence & Security66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "nato"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Defence & Security
Vote ID 162049Source: official EP roll-call records
56
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Defence
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+15 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+12 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The revised Pollinators Initiative – A new deal for pollinators”. EPP, ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (259 for, 275 against, 10 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
259
Against
275
Abstain
10
Margin of victory
16 votes
Turnout (cast)
544
Absent
158
Participation rate
77.5%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 16 votes. 158 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (158) was larger than the 16-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • S&Dhad 38 absent MEPs (margin was 16)
  • EPPhad 37 absent MEPs (margin was 16)
  • NIhad 18 absent MEPs (margin was 16)
  • Renewhad 17 absent MEPs (margin was 16)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Germany (24 absent)Italy (23 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 133Against 8Abstain 1Absent 37
S&D136 MEPs
For 1Against 95Abstain 2Absent 38
Renew100 MEPs
For 11Against 72Abstain 0Absent 17
ECR64 MEPs
For 52Against 1Abstain 3Absent 8
Greens/EFA70 MEPs
For 0Against 55Abstain 0Absent 15
PfE64 MEPs
For 48Against 0Abstain 1Absent 15
NI46 MEPs
For 10Against 17Abstain 1Absent 18
The Left36 MEPs
For 1Against 27Abstain 0Absent 8
ESN4 MEPs
For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany41
  • Poland36
  • Italy33
  • Romania13
  • Czech Republic10
Most against
  • France44
  • Spain33
  • Portugal14
  • Belgium12
  • Sweden10
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 7Against 7Abstain 0Absent 5
Belgium21 MEPs
For 4Against 12Abstain 1Absent 4
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 0Absent 6
Croatia12 MEPs
For 6Against 4Abstain 0Absent 2
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 10Against 5Abstain 3Absent 3
Denmark14 MEPs
For 2Against 9Abstain 0Absent 3
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 4Against 9Abstain 0Absent 1
France79 MEPs
For 23Against 44Abstain 0Absent 12
Germany96 MEPs
For 41Against 31Abstain 0Absent 24
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 6Abstain 1Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 7Against 3Abstain 0Absent 11
Ireland13 MEPs
For 4Against 8Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 33Against 20Abstain 0Absent 23
Latvia8 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 1Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 7Against 7Abstain 0Absent 15
Poland51 MEPs
For 36Against 10Abstain 1Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 5Against 14Abstain 0Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 13Against 10Abstain 2Absent 8
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 1Absent 5
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain57 MEPs
For 17Against 33Abstain 1Absent 6
Sweden21 MEPs
For 9Against 10Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share