← Votes·2023-12-12

Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials

Internal Market85%★

Confidence: 85%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

dossier "critical raw materials" implies this topic

Reviewed: yes

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Internal Market →

Environment60%

Confidence: 60%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

dossier "critical raw materials" implies this topic

Reviewed: no

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Environment →

Vote ID 162142Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Main vote
✓Legislative procedure
✓Some political group division
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+8 / 15

Turnout+5 / 5

Vote type+25 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+15 / 15

Rebel votes+7 / 10

Group division+6 / 15

Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (549 for, 43 against, 24 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For

549

Against

Abstain

Margin of victory

506 votes

Turnout (cast)

616

Absent

Participation rate

87.5%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs

For 157Against 1Abstain 1Absent 20

S&D136 MEPs

For 121Against 1Abstain 0Absent 14

Renew100 MEPs

For 86Against 0Abstain 0Absent 14

ECR65 MEPs

For 56Against 2Abstain 2Absent 5

Greens/EFA70 MEPs

For 44Against 10Abstain 6Absent 10

PfE64 MEPs

For 47Against 6Abstain 0Absent 11

NI46 MEPs

For 28Against 7Abstain 2Absent 9

The Left37 MEPs

For 5Against 15Abstain 13Absent 4

ESN4 MEPs

For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour

Germany69
Italy63
France54
Spain47
Poland45

Most against

None.

Divided delegations

Finland

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria19 MEPs

For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Belgium21 MEPs

For 17Against 2Abstain 0Absent 2

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 15Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Croatia12 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 4Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 19Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1

Denmark14 MEPs

For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Estonia7 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Finland14 MEPs

For 7Against 5Abstain 1Absent 1

France79 MEPs

For 54Against 7Abstain 8Absent 10

Germany96 MEPs

For 69Against 9Abstain 6Absent 12

Greece21 MEPs

For 14Against 2Abstain 0Absent 5

Hungary21 MEPs

For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Ireland13 MEPs

For 9Against 3Abstain 1Absent 0

Italy76 MEPs

For 63Against 1Abstain 1Absent 11

Latvia8 MEPs

For 7Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 4Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1

Malta6 MEPs

For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Netherlands29 MEPs

For 20Against 3Abstain 1Absent 5

Poland52 MEPs

For 45Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7

Portugal21 MEPs

For 16Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1

Romania33 MEPs

For 27Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6

Slovakia14 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2

Slovenia8 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Spain58 MEPs

For 47Against 4Abstain 0Absent 7

Sweden21 MEPs

For 15Against 1Abstain 1Absent 4

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…