EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2023-12-12

Addictive design of online services and consumer protection in the EU single market

Internal Market64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "single market"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Internal Market
Consumer Protection64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "consumer protection"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Consumer Protection
Vote ID 162206Source: official EP roll-call records
75
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+5 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Addictive design of online services and consumer protection in the EU single market”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI and Left voted mostly in favour. ECR and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (545 for, 12 against, 61 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
545
Against
12
Abstain
61
Margin of victory
533 votes
Turnout (cast)
618
Absent
86
Participation rate
87.8%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 158Against 0Abstain 2Absent 19
S&D136 MEPs
For 122Against 0Abstain 0Absent 14
Renew100 MEPs
For 82Against 1Abstain 4Absent 13
Greens/EFA70 MEPs
For 61Against 0Abstain 0Absent 9
ECR65 MEPs
For 14Against 8Abstain 37Absent 6
PfE64 MEPs
For 41Against 0Abstain 12Absent 11
NI46 MEPs
For 32Against 1Abstain 4Absent 9
The Left37 MEPs
For 33Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 1Abstain 2Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany75
  • France69
  • Italy65
  • Spain48
  • Romania26
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 3Absent 1
Belgium21 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 3Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 2Absent 2
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 4Abstain 0Absent 2
Denmark14 MEPs
For 11Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
Estonia7 MEPs
For 3Against 0Abstain 4Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
France79 MEPs
For 69Against 1Abstain 0Absent 9
Germany96 MEPs
For 75Against 0Abstain 9Absent 12
Greece21 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 2Absent 6
Hungary21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Ireland13 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 65Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11
Latvia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 21Against 3Abstain 0Absent 5
Poland52 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 26Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Romania33 MEPs
For 26Against 0Abstain 2Absent 5
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 1Absent 2
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Spain58 MEPs
For 48Against 0Abstain 3Absent 7
Sweden21 MEPs
For 13Against 2Abstain 2Absent 4

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share