Tuesday’s Agenda - Request from the Renew and S&D groups
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Tuesday’s Agenda - Request from the Renew and S&D groups”. S&D, EPP, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, Left and NI voted mostly in favour. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (299 for, 17 against, 25 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany51
- France36
- Italy31
- Spain20
- Poland19
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…