Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for tricyclazole
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for tricyclazole”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (500 for, 42 against, 4 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany70
- France61
- Italy56
- Spain46
- Poland42
None.
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…