Role of preventive diplomacy in tackling frozen conflicts around the world – missed opportunity or change for the future?
Foreign Affairs63%★
- title/description contains "diplomacy"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Role of preventive diplomacy in tackling frozen conflicts around the world – missed opportunity or change for the future?”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR and NI voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. Left mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (480 for, 108 against, 34 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany70
- Poland48
- Spain48
- Italy47
- France41
- Hungary11
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- France
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…