EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2024-01-18

Implementation of the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation in fisheries and aquaculture – Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013

Fisheries87%
Confidence: 87%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "fisheries"
  • title/description contains "aquaculture"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Fisheries
Vote ID 163472Source: official EP roll-call records
49
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+5 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+12 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Implementation of the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation in fisheries and aquaculture – Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013”. Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D and ECR voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (262 for, 271 against, 16 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
262
Against
271
Abstain
16
Margin of victory
9 votes
Turnout (cast)
549
Absent
156
Participation rate
77.9%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 9 votes. 156 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (156) was larger than the 9-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • EPPhad 50 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • S&Dhad 30 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • PfEhad 16 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • Renewhad 14 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • ECRhad 14 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • Greens-EFAhad 12 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • Lefthad 11 absent MEPs (margin was 9)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Germany (26 absent)Italy (24 absent)France (14 absent)Romania (14 absent)Spain (10 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 7Against 122Abstain 0Absent 50
S&D136 MEPs
For 12Against 94Abstain 0Absent 30
Renew100 MEPs
For 78Against 8Abstain 0Absent 14
Greens/EFA70 MEPs
For 58Against 0Abstain 0Absent 12
ECR65 MEPs
For 19Against 28Abstain 4Absent 14
PfE64 MEPs
For 37Against 6Abstain 5Absent 16
NI46 MEPs
For 21Against 12Abstain 4Absent 9
The Left38 MEPs
For 27Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 1Abstain 3Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France52
  • Italy30
  • Netherlands15
  • Czech Republic13
  • Belgium11
Most against
  • Poland42
  • Germany34
  • Spain30
  • Portugal14
  • Romania13
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Estonia
  • Germany
  • Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 7Against 8Abstain 0Absent 4
Belgium21 MEPs
For 11Against 6Abstain 0Absent 4
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 5Against 4Abstain 0Absent 8
Croatia12 MEPs
For 3Against 8Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 2Abstain 0Absent 2
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 13Against 7Abstain 0Absent 1
Denmark14 MEPs
For 10Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
France79 MEPs
For 52Against 12Abstain 1Absent 14
Germany96 MEPs
For 28Against 34Abstain 8Absent 26
Greece21 MEPs
For 6Against 6Abstain 2Absent 7
Hungary21 MEPs
For 2Against 11Abstain 0Absent 8
Ireland13 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 30Against 22Abstain 0Absent 24
Latvia8 MEPs
For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 5
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 0Absent 3
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 0Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 15Against 5Abstain 1Absent 8
Poland52 MEPs
For 4Against 42Abstain 1Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 6Against 14Abstain 0Absent 1
Romania33 MEPs
For 6Against 13Abstain 0Absent 14
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 4Against 7Abstain 1Absent 2
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain59 MEPs
For 19Against 30Abstain 0Absent 10
Sweden21 MEPs
For 8Against 10Abstain 2Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share