Protection of journalists and human rights defenders from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings ***I
Media Freedom65%★
- title/description contains "journalist"
Human Rights64%
- title/description contains "human rights"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Media Freedom
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Protection of journalists and human rights defenders from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings ***I”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (546 for, 47 against, 31 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany77
- Italy61
- France56
- Poland49
- Spain47
- Hungary9
- Hungary
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…