Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – implementation and outcomes in the Member States
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – implementation and outcomes in the Member States”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (433 for, 36 against, 51 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany59
- France51
- Italy50
- Poland45
- Spain41
- Sweden7
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…