Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group”. Renew and ECR voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (82 for, 211 against, 15 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland11
- Luxembourg2
- Estonia1
- Germany31
- Italy31
- France24
- Spain18
- Netherlands13
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- France
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Romania
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…