EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2024-03-13

Guidelines for the 2025 Budget – Section III

Budget66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "budget"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Budget
Vote ID 166471Source: official EP roll-call records
88
/ 100

Importance Score

Key vote

Why this vote stands out:

  • Resolution / budget vote
  • Budget-related
  • High-interest topic: Budget
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+15 / 25
Close vote+15 / 15
Legislative+12 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+10 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Guidelines for the 2025 Budget – Section III”. S&D, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (279 for, 280 against, 16 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
279
Against
280
Abstain
16
Margin of victory
1 votes
Turnout (cast)
575
Absent
130
Participation rate
81.6%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 1 vote. 130 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (130) was larger than the 1-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • EPPhad 29 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • S&Dhad 22 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • Renewhad 18 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • ECRhad 16 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • NIhad 16 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • PfEhad 13 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • Greens-EFAhad 10 absent MEPs (margin was 1)
  • Lefthad 6 absent MEPs (margin was 1)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Italy (18 absent)Germany (16 absent)Greece (10 absent)Romania (10 absent)France (9 absent)Hungary (8 absent)Poland (8 absent)Spain (8 absent)Netherlands (5 absent)Austria (4 absent)Bulgaria (4 absent)Cyprus (4 absent)Belgium (3 absent)Denmark (3 absent)Finland (3 absent)Latvia (3 absent)Malta (3 absent)Slovakia (3 absent)Lithuania (2 absent)Sweden (2 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 23Against 124Abstain 3Absent 29
S&D136 MEPs
For 107Against 7Abstain 0Absent 22
Renew100 MEPs
For 39Against 42Abstain 1Absent 18
Greens/EFA70 MEPs
For 60Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
PfE64 MEPs
For 0Against 50Abstain 1Absent 13
ECR65 MEPs
For 2Against 41Abstain 6Absent 16
The Left38 MEPs
For 32Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
NI46 MEPs
For 16Against 10Abstain 4Absent 16
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 3Abstain 1Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany46
  • France42
  • Spain29
  • Netherlands18
  • Portugal18
Most against
  • Poland38
  • Italy32
  • Romania23
  • Czech Republic12
  • Bulgaria11
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Croatia
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 7Against 8Abstain 0Absent 4
Belgium21 MEPs
For 6Against 8Abstain 4Absent 3
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 2Against 11Abstain 0Absent 4
Croatia12 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 5Against 12Abstain 3Absent 1
Denmark14 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 0Absent 3
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 7Against 4Abstain 0Absent 3
France79 MEPs
For 42Against 26Abstain 2Absent 9
Germany96 MEPs
For 46Against 34Abstain 0Absent 16
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 3Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 4Against 9Abstain 0Absent 8
Ireland13 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 25Against 32Abstain 1Absent 18
Latvia8 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 3
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta6 MEPs
For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 3
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 18Against 6Abstain 0Absent 5
Poland52 MEPs
For 6Against 38Abstain 0Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 18Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1
Romania33 MEPs
For 0Against 23Abstain 0Absent 10
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 4Against 5Abstain 2Absent 3
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain59 MEPs
For 29Against 22Abstain 0Absent 8
Sweden21 MEPs
For 14Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share