Establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, for identifying an illegally staying third-country national or stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes (recast) ***I
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, for identifying an illegally staying third-country national or stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes (recast) ***I”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Greens-EFA, NI and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (404 for, 202 against, 16 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany58
- France47
- Spain42
- Italy35
- Netherlands18
- Poland37
- Hungary11
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- Greece
- Hungary
- Italy
- Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…