Asylum and migration management ***I
Migration & Asylum87%★
- title/description contains "migration"
- title/description contains "asylum"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Migration
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Asylum and migration management ***I”. EPP, S&D and Renew voted mostly in favour, while Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (322 for, 266 against, 31 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany49
- Spain40
- Netherlands21
- Romania15
- Sweden14
- France45
- Poland37
- Italy34
- Czech Republic15
- Hungary12
- Belgium
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…