Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group (A9-0329/2023)
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group (A9-0329/2023)”. PfE, ECR and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. Left mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (70 for, 277 against, 27 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland17
- Hungary9
- Estonia1
- Germany48
- France34
- Spain28
- Italy23
- Netherlands12
- Estonia
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…