Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Specific hygiene requirements for certain meat, fishery products, dairy products and eggs
Fisheries66%★
- title/description contains "fishery"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Specific hygiene requirements for certain meat, fishery products, dairy products and eggs”. EPP, ECR and NI voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, Left and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (179 for, 403 against, 28 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland45
- Czech Republic9
- Bulgaria8
- Greece6
- Lithuania5
- France66
- Germany57
- Italy50
- Spain49
- Portugal20
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Latvia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…