Increasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending certain regulations ***I
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Increasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending certain regulations ***I”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, PfE, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (533 for, 31 against, 28 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany71
- Spain52
- France50
- Italy49
- Poland44
None.
None notably divided.
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…