EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2024-04-24

Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements ***I

Vote ID 168559Source: official EP roll-call records
61
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements ***I”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (530 for, 36 against, 14 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
530
Against
36
Abstain
14
Margin of victory
494 votes
Turnout (cast)
580
Absent
125
Participation rate
82.3%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP179 MEPs
For 146Against 0Abstain 0Absent 33
S&D136 MEPs
For 112Against 0Abstain 0Absent 24
Renew100 MEPs
For 89Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11
Greens/EFA70 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
ECR65 MEPs
For 49Against 5Abstain 2Absent 9
PfE64 MEPs
For 18Against 23Abstain 5Absent 18
The Left38 MEPs
For 30Against 0Abstain 2Absent 6
NI46 MEPs
For 21Against 6Abstain 2Absent 17
ESN4 MEPs
For 0Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany75
  • France53
  • Spain50
  • Italy46
  • Poland44
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 2Absent 2
Belgium21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 3Absent 0
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 18Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1
Denmark14 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 1Absent 3
Estonia7 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
France79 MEPs
For 53Against 18Abstain 0Absent 8
Germany96 MEPs
For 75Against 8Abstain 0Absent 13
Greece21 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 2Absent 8
Hungary21 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
Ireland13 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 46Against 0Abstain 0Absent 30
Latvia8 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Netherlands29 MEPs
For 26Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1
Poland52 MEPs
For 44Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 2Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 13
Slovakia14 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 1Absent 3
Slovenia8 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain59 MEPs
For 50Against 4Abstain 0Absent 5
Sweden21 MEPs
For 17Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share